Gujrat Titans won the match by 7 wicket.
Player of the Match: Jos Buttler
| Team | Gujrat Titans |
| Points | 166.0 |
| Runs | 126* (63) |
| Sixes | 8 |
| Fours | 8 |
| Strike Rate | 200.00 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 1 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | Gujrat Titans |
| Points | 102.0 |
| Runs | 72 (44) |
| Sixes | 1 |
| Fours | 8 |
| Strike Rate | 163.64 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | Gujrat Titans |
| Points | 27.0 |
| Runs | 7 (3) |
| Sixes | 1 |
| Fours | 0 |
| Strike Rate | 233.33 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 1 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | Cheenai Super Kings |
| Points | 132.0 |
| Runs | 102 (52) |
| Sixes | 6 |
| Fours | 7 |
| Strike Rate | 196.15 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | Cheenai Super Kings |
| Points | 67.0 |
| Runs | 47 (26) |
| Sixes | 2 |
| Fours | 4 |
| Strike Rate | 180.77 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
Gujrat Titans won the toss and opted to Bowl first.
Gujrat Titans won the match by 7 wicket.
Player of the match: Jos Buttler
The Gujrat Titans secured a 7-wicket victory against the Cheenai Super Kings. This analysis focuses solely on the provided match data to present a clear and unbiased summary of the game's key events.
Dewald Brewis was the highest scorer for Cheenai Super Kings, accumulating 102 runs from 52 balls at a strike rate of 196.2. His innings included 7 fours and 6 sixes. Shivam Dube contributed 47 runs off 26 balls, striking 4 fours and 2 sixes, with a strike rate of 180.8. Sanju Samson added 24 runs from 14 deliveries, hitting 2 fours and 1 six, maintaining a strike rate of 171.4.
Jos Buttler led the Gujrat Titans' chase with an impressive 126 runs off 63 balls, achieving a strike rate of 200. His innings featured 8 fours and 8 sixes. Sai Sudharshan supported with 72 runs from 44 balls, including 8 fours and 1 six, at a strike rate of 163.6. Glenn Philips provided a quick cameo, scoring 12 runs off 4 balls, hitting 1 four and 1 six, resulting in a strike rate of 300.
Fielding played a crucial role in the match. Shubman Gill was involved in the catch that dismissed Ruturaj Gaikwad. Jos Buttler contributed in the field by taking the catch to dismiss Dewald Brewis. In the other innings Ruturaj Gaikwad took a catch of Shubman Gill. Sanju Samson was involved in the catch dismissing Sharukh Khan.
Gujrat Titans won the match by 7 wickets. The data highlights Jos Buttler's significant contribution with the bat and key fielding moments from both sides impacted the game.
Further analysis could be conducted pending additional data regarding bowler performance, run rate progression and partnership statistics. This analysis is limited to the data provided.
The absence of bowling statistics for the first innings and second innings limit the comprehensive nature of this analysis. Without these details, a complete picture of how CSK's bowlers performed and how GT bowlers were able to contain CSK during their innings is difficult to ascertain. Economy rates, total runs conceded, and number of overs bowled would add valuable context.
Similarly, more granular data on the specific overs in which wickets fell and runs were scored would enhance the analysis. This would allow identification of crucial turning points in the game and highlight periods of dominance for each team.
The contribution of other batsmen in both innings, even if they scored few runs, would provide a fuller picture of the batting performance. Their strike rates, number of balls faced, and any boundaries they hit would offer valuable insights.
More detailed fielding statistics, such as the number of catches dropped and the number of run-out attempts, would provide a more comprehensive assessment of the fielding performance of both teams. These details, combined with the already available catch information, would paint a more complete picture of the fielding effort.
In summary, while the provided data offers a basic overview of the match, additional information on bowling performance, run-rate progression, partnership statistics, and more detailed fielding statistics would be necessary for a more in-depth and comprehensive analysis.
This analysis is based exclusively on the provided data and avoids any assumptions or inferences beyond the facts presented.
Inning1:
Inning2: