MI won the match by 62 run
Player of the Match: Harkirat
| Team | MI |
| Points | 111.0 |
| Runs | 21 (24) |
| Sixes | 2 |
| Fours | 2 |
| Strike Rate | 87.50 |
| Wickets Taken | 4 |
| Economy Rate | 11.03 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
Cric'O Scoring
| Team | MI |
| Points | 50.0 |
| Runs | 30 (9) |
| Sixes | 5 |
| Fours | 0 |
| Strike Rate | 333.33 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | MI |
| Points | 30.0 |
| Runs | 20* (8) |
| Sixes | 2 |
| Fours | 2 |
| Strike Rate | 250.00 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | CSK |
| Points | 148.0 |
| Runs | 33* (14) |
| Sixes | 2 |
| Fours | 5 |
| Strike Rate | 235.71 |
| Wickets Taken | 4 |
| Economy Rate | 11.80 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | CSK |
| Points | 24.0 |
| Runs | 14 (7) |
| Sixes | 1 |
| Fours | 2 |
| Strike Rate | 200.00 |
| Wickets Taken | 0 |
| Economy Rate | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
CSK won the toss and opted to Bowl first.
MI won the match by 62 run
Player of the match: Harkirat
The match between MI and CSK concluded with MI winning by a significant margin of 62 runs. This analysis focuses solely on the provided data to objectively summarize the key events and performances that contributed to the match outcome. The following sections detail the batting summaries for both MI and CSK, followed by observations on fielding and the final result.
MI's innings featured several impactful performances. H3 scored 30 runs off just 9 balls, achieving a strike rate of 333.3. His innings included 5 sixes and no fours. Harkirat contributed 21 runs from 24 balls, with a strike rate of 87.5, hitting 2 fours and 2 sixes. H5 added 20 runs off 8 balls, maintaining a strike rate of 250, with 2 fours and 2 sixes. These contributions were instrumental in setting the target for CSK.
CSK's chase was characterized by some aggressive batting, but ultimately fell short. Sukhnaj scored 33 runs off 14 balls, with a strike rate of 235.7, including 5 fours and 2 sixes. S5 managed 14 runs off 7 balls, achieving a strike rate of 200, hitting 2 fours and 1 six. S4 scored 4 runs off 4 balls, with a strike rate of 100, including 1 four and no sixes. These performances, while showing intent, weren't enough to reach the target set by MI.
The provided data does not contain specific details about individual fielding plays such as catches, run-outs, or direct hits. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of fielding impact is not possible based on the available information. However, fielding undoubtedly played a role in restricting scoring opportunities and building pressure on the batting sides. Future analysis should incorporate detailed fielding statistics to provide a more complete picture of the match.
MI won the match by 62 runs. The batting performances of H3, Harkirat, and H5 in the first innings proved crucial in establishing a strong foundation. While Sukhnaj and S5 showed promise in the second innings, CSK ultimately fell short of the required total. The absence of bowling data for both innings prevents a detailed assessment of the bowlers' contributions to the match result. Similarly, the lack of detailed fielding data limits the analysis of fielding's impact. However, based on the batting statistics alone, MI's first-innings performance was the defining factor in their victory.
Inning1:
Inning2:
