1990 won the match by 16 run
Player of the Match: Karthik
| Team | 1990 |
| Points | 68.0 |
| Runs | 8 (5) |
| Sixes | 1 |
| Fours | 0 |
| Strike Rate | 160.00 |
| Wickets Taken | 2 |
| Economy Rate | 9.50 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | 1990 |
| Points | 55.0 |
| Runs | 25 (8) |
| Sixes | 3 |
| Fours | 1 |
| Strike Rate | 312.50 |
| Wickets Taken | 1 |
| Economy Rate | 11.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | 1990 |
| Points | 36.0 |
| Runs | 1* (1) |
| Sixes | 0 |
| Fours | 0 |
| Strike Rate | 100.00 |
| Wickets Taken | 1 |
| Economy Rate | 4.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | 1993 |
| Points | 68.0 |
| Runs | 13* (6) |
| Sixes | 1 |
| Fours | 1 |
| Strike Rate | 216.67 |
| Wickets Taken | 2 |
| Economy Rate | 13.00 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
| Team | 1993 |
| Points | 28.0 |
| Runs | 3 (3) |
| Sixes | 0 |
| Fours | 0 |
| Strike Rate | 100.00 |
| Wickets Taken | 1 |
| Economy Rate | 9.50 |
| Catches | 0 |
| Stumpings | 0 |
| Run Outs | 0 |
1990 won the toss and opted to Bat first.
1990 won the match by 16 run
Player of the match: Karthik
The match between 1990 and 1993 concluded with 1990 securing a victory by 16 runs. This analysis will focus solely on the provided performance data to objectively assess the key aspects of the game. This report will detail batting statistics for both innings, emphasizing strike rates and boundary contributions. Furthermore, impactful fielding events will be explicitly noted to provide a comprehensive overview of the match dynamics.
In the first innings, the 1990 team's batting performance was characterized by aggressive scoring. Jaise emerged as the highest scorer, accumulating 25 runs from 8 balls, which translates to a striking strike rate of 312.5. His innings included one four and three sixes, demonstrating a clear intent to maximize scoring opportunities. Sujith contributed 20 runs off 14 balls, maintaining a strike rate of 142.9. Sujith’s innings consisted of three fours. Vignesh added 11 runs from 8 balls, with a strike rate of 137.5, including one four. The combined effect of these contributions established a foundation for 1990's total score. Irshad, Thaufiq, and Nabeel did not bowl in the first innings, therefore their bowling statistics are not applicable to the 1990 Batting Summary. Analyzing these figures reveals a strategy focused on maximizing run accumulation through aggressive hitting and capitalizing on boundary opportunities. The high strike rates indicate a proactive approach by the batsmen to put pressure on the opposition's bowling attack. This aggressive approach likely contributed significantly to setting a competitive target for 1993.
During the chase, the 1993 team's batting efforts were led by Deepak, who scored 16 runs off 8 balls, achieving a strike rate of 200. His innings included two sixes, showcasing his ability to clear the boundary. Prasanna contributed 13 runs from 6 balls, with a strike rate of 216.7, including one four and one six. Thaufiq added 8 runs from 4 balls, maintaining a strike rate of 200, including one six. Despite these contributions, the 1993 team fell short of the target by 16 runs. Ron, Matthew, and Sukumar did not bowl in the second innings, therefore their bowling statistics are not applicable to the 1993 Chase Summary. Examining these statistics reveals that while individual batsmen displayed aggressive intent, the team as a whole could not sustain the required scoring rate to overtake 1990's total. The inability to convert starts into substantial scores ultimately hampered their chase, leading to the final result.
Fielding played a crucial role in the match outcome. Nabeel's involvement in the catch dismissal of Jaise was a significant moment, potentially disrupting 1990's momentum. Similarly, Vignesh's catch to dismiss Deepak impacted 1993's chase. These fielding contributions highlight the importance of sharp fielding skills in influencing match dynamics. The dismissals of key batsmen at critical junctures can significantly alter the course of the game, demonstrating the value of proactive fielding.
1990 won the match by 16 runs. The outcome can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the aggressive batting display by 1990 in the first innings and key fielding moments that influenced the dismissals of crucial batsmen from both teams. While individual batsmen from 1993 demonstrated aggressive intent during the chase, they ultimately fell short of the target set by 1990.
Inning1:
Inning2: